Islamic War Against the West

Most everyone agrees the “extremists” are bad, must be stopped. But where do those extremists come from? They come from mosques and Madrasahs. They are taught as children.

This is why we cannot allow more mosques to be built – anywhere in the US: because we VALUE religious freedom, and Islam is fundamentally, violently, persistently AGAINST freedom of religion.

This sweet-looking, sweet-sounding young Muslim woman is praising Allah for a child spouting back hatred and racism. It is being taught. She talks about the “next generation” of Muslim children. True Muslims are those who believe from childhood that Jews and infidels are “apes and pigs”?

Those of you who shy away from objecting to Islam on the grounds of “religious freedom”: is this what you want? So, all we have to do to protect and promote racist, bigoted teaching is put the label “religion” on it?

Here is a partial transcript of the video:

Muslim woman: Our report today will be a little different, because our guest will be a girl, a Muslim girl, but a true Muslim, Allah willing, may God give us the strength to give our children the same education, so that the next generation of children will all be true Muslims who know that they are Muslims and know who their enemies are.

Muslim woman: Basmallah, do you know the Jews?

Basmallah: Yes.

Do you like them?

Basmallah: No.

Why don’t you like them?

Basmallah: Because they are apes and pigs.

Who said that about them?

Basmallah: Our God.

Where did he say that about them?

Basmallah: In the Koran.

He said this about them in the Koran. That’s right. Basmallah, what do the Jews do? Do they love our Prophet Muhammad?

Basmallah: No.

What did the Jews do to him?

Basmallah: He killed someone.

Of course, our Prophet Muhammad was strong and could kill them. Do you know traditions about what the Jews did to our Prophet Muhammad? Is there a story you know?

Basmallah: Yes.

Which one?

Basmallah: The one about the Jewish woman.

What did the Jewish woman do to our Prophet Muhammad?

Basmallah: She invited the Prophet and his companions when he asked her if she had put poison in his food, she said, ‘yes”.

He asked her, “Why did you do this?”

She replied, “If you are a liar, you will die, and Allah will not protect you, but if you speak the truth Allah will protect you.”

Muslim woman: And God protected the Prophet of course.

Basmallah: And he said to his companions, “I will kill this woman.”

Of course, she put poison in his food, this Jewess.

Muslim woman: Allah be praised, may our God bless her, no one could wish for a more devout girl. May God bless her and her parents.

The next generation of children must be true Muslims, Allah willing. We must educate them while they are still children to be true Muslims.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjbJnZUJTYU&feature=player_embedded

(09-01) 17:51 PDT MILPITAS — A federal civil rights agency sued Abercrombie & Fitch on Wednesday on behalf of an 18-year-old woman who said she applied for her first job at the company’s store at the Great Mall in Milpitas and was turned down because she wore a Muslim headscarf.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission went to court against Abercrombie & Fitch last year over a similar incident in Tulsa, Okla. In Wednesday’s suit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, the agency again accused the Ohio company of discriminating on the basis of religion.

“This retailer that targets a youth market is sending the message that you cannot aspire to their ‘All American’ brand if you wear a head covering to comply with your faith,” said William Tamayo, the agency’s regional attorney.

Company representatives could not be reached for comment. In court filings in the Oklahoma case, which is pending, lawyers for Abercrombie & Fitch denied discriminating and said allowing the employee to wear a hijab, or headscarf, “would have created an undue hardship” for the company’s business.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2010%2F09%2F01%2FBATJ1F7BVC.DTL#ixzz0yPxfXife

This is not just a case of someone’s feelings being hurt – it is a calculated effort to impose Sharia Law on a society that does not want it. Americans make the mistake of thinking, “Big deal, it’s just a scarf, let them wear whatever they want”. But it is more than that: it is imposing Islamic will, Islamic culture, Islamic ideology on our own, not to “get along” but to dominate.

by Citizen Warrior: “There are many ways to wage jihad. All of them must be stopped — without racism or hatred.”

“Most of us are used to dealing with people who will not exploit our “niceness.” We deal with fair, considerate people almost all the time, and our ways of dealing with fair people work very well.

But here’s what we all have to learn sooner or later: For people who ignore your signals and keep pushing, you had better develop a different approach — an approach with more firmness and strength, an approach that protects yourself and defends your interests.

The same goes for dealing with aggressive vacuum-cleaner salesmen. Have they ever come to your door? If you show the slightest interest, you’ll be stuck talking to them until you say yes. They are relentless, and to deal with it, you had better be firm.

Islam operates much the same, except on a much larger scale with a political agenda. Islam is pressing for concessions constantly, trying to find the weaknesses, trying to find the cracks, the loopholes, and it will keep pushing until it accomplishes its goal: A world in which every country is ruled by Shari’a law.

This is not one of those problems that will go away by itself. It is up to us to be firm. They are not going to stop on their own. They must be stopped by us.”

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/10/waging-jihad-by-gaining-concessions.html

I once had a job working for a seminar company. My job was to call people who had taken an introductory seminar and convince them to take the main seminar we were selling. I was given a stack of cards participants had filled out at the introductory seminar and I was told how to handle the calls: “If they give you a definite ‘no,’ throw the card away. Otherwise put it here and we’ll call them again later.”

And we would keep calling these people, harassing them for years because those people were too nice to simply say, “I am not interested.” People would say, “I don’t know, let me think about it.” They would say all kinds of things other than “no.” I could hear in their voices that most of them really wanted to say no, but they wouldn’t. I felt sorry for these people, and yet I couldn’t help but think they were stupid. Why not be firm? Why not be honest? It would save them a lot of stress. If only they knew my instructions, they would have said no firmly right up front.

But the thing is, most of us are used to dealing with people who will not exploit our “niceness.” We deal with fair, considerate people almost all the time, and our ways of dealing with fair people work very well. I’m assuming you are a fair person. What do you do? If someone gave you a “socially acceptable” excuse like “I’ll think about it,” you would let them bow out, wouldn’t you? You wouldn’t ignore their signals and keep pushing.

But here’s what we all have to learn sooner or later: For people who ignore your signals and keep pushing, you had better develop a different approach — an approach with more firmness and strength, an approach that protects yourself and defends your interests.

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/10/waging-jihad-by-gaining-concessions.html

It was the very nice people of Minnesota who elected the United State’s very first Muslim congressman: Keith Ellison

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/08/muslim.elect/

“Earnest Muslims are using every method they can think of to shut down criticism and free speech.

They legally lobby politicians and media outlets, pressuring them to silence or fire someone who criticized Islam. They slander anyone who criticizes Islam by calling them “Islamophobic” or “racist.” They bring lawsuits against people even if they know they will not win because the bad press is damaging enough. And they riot in the streets.

After a Dutch newspaper published a cartoon depicting Mohammad, Muslims rioted all over Europe, leaving 187 people dead and making publishers think twice about publishing something critical to Islam again.

And this aggressive religion will keep pushing unless we stop it. A sufficient number of them will not try to be fair, will not try to “assimilate” into the European or American culture, and will never let up on the pressure to take over. It is their religious duty.

The way to stop its spread without being cruel or violent is to establish the policy: No more concessions to Islam.”

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/10/waging-jihad-by-gaining-concessions.html

This is why it is not “Islamophobia” or “intolerance” to say, “No, you may not build your mosque in our city. No, you may not send more immigrants to our country – in fact, we would like you to go back home now.” – because, folks, the more numbers Islam has, here in the US, the more power they have. They know this.

Here’s an example: the very first Muslim congressman – ever – was elected in Minnesota. Let me ask you, do you think that all those Andersons, Swensons and Johnsons, all those Swedes and Norwegians, had a Muslim as their first choice?

Being the kind, friendly people they are, Minnesotans warmly welcomed more and more Somali Muslims into their state.

“With 99 percent of the precincts reporting, Ellison received 135,519 votes, Fine 51,896, and Lee, 51,250.”

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/08/muslim.elect/

And just as you would be right to object to Muslims storing up ever-increasing stores of ammunition and explosives in your neighborhood, you are responding to a very real threat when you object to ever-increasing numbers of Muslims.

It’s not that the individual people are bad people. They may actually be very nice. But they are part of a totalitarian ideology that wants to destroy your way of life and replace it with Sharia Law. That’s not wild paranoia, that’s the clearly stated intent of Islam.

We certainly would not advocate treating any person badly – but that doesn’t mean we have to let Islam come in and push its way into our lives.

1. Giving in to political pressure by Muslims and their supporters, a National Counterterrorism Center memorandum prohibited the use of terms such as “Jihad,” “Islamist,” and “mujahedeen.”

2. The United Nations General Assembly is considering a resolution sponsored by the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference in an attempt to “mainstream” prohibitions on any speech that could be considered critical of Islam.

3. Told by Muslims it could incite acts of violence, Random House decided not to publish a book on Mohammad — after it had already bought the rights.

All three are Muslim attempts to accomplish the same goal: To hamper a non-Muslim’s ability to criticize Islam publicly. Every totalitarian state that ever ruled a nation has done the same thing, and did it first. If you can’t criticize something in public, you are left with your private thoughts and your few intimate friends. Are you the only ones who think this way? You don’t know. Silencing criticism isolates the dissenters. And it prevents important public discussions from taking place.

Silencing criticism makes it possible for other concessions to be gained without effective opposition.

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/10/waging-jihad-by-gaining-concessions.html

Here’s the principal: if they silence you, they win. If they make you afraid to speak up, they win. You are already a dhimmi. You have already been subjugated. A small subjugation the will be followed by increasingly more oppressive subjugations.

Nice people make an easy target for Islam. Strong Americans need to stand up and speak up for those nice Americans who, though well-meaning and kind, do not even realize they are being used to gradually implement Sharia Law in the US.

Don’t be shy. It’s OK to say, “No!”

“IF YOUR GOAL was the eventual overthrow of the government and establishing Shari’a Law as the law of the land, but you didn’t have a large enough majority to do it by voting or by force, how could you do it? One good way would be to keep pressing for small, incremental concessions. And when you gain one, to hold it, and try to gain another.

And if you were using this strategy, what is the first concession you’d try to gain? I think it would be to establish laws and cultural norms that prohibit criticism of your group or its goals in speech or writing. This could effectively prevent an organized effort to block the next concessions you try to gain.”

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/10/waging-jihad-by-gaining-concessions.html

Pay very careful attention to this: when you let our leaders make concessions to Islam, and do not object strongly, you are letting them allow Sharia Law on American soil.

Concessions = Victory

“Every accomodation non-Muslims make for Muslims moves our culture, our beliefs, and our legal systems one step closer to Sharia law.

The concession itself is the establishment of Sharia law.

Let’s look at an example. Around the world, Muslims react strongly when anyone criticizes Islam. Why? In Sharia law, it is forbidden to criticize either Islam or Mohammad. This is a precept of Sharia law.

Forbidding the criticism of any religion is certainly not a precept of a free society or of Western civilization. This means: To whatever degree Islamic supremacists succeed in silencing our criticisms of Islam, to that degree they have imposed Sharia law on non-Muslims.

Do you know what this means? When the U.S. government stops using words that even imply that Islam might have something to do with terrorism (out of their fear of offending Muslims), what has happened? Islamic supremacists have successfully imposed Sharia law on the U.S. government! This has already happened.”

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2010/07/concessions-to-islam-are-sharia.html

This is why it is very important for us to not allow ourselves to be intimidated or shamed into staying silent when we see Islam doing offensive things in our culture. Don’t be afraid of people shouting accusations of “xenophobe!” or “Islamophobe!” That is a ploy, a tactic, part of a strategy to subjugate our culture.

Recognize it for what it is: a calculated attempt to bully, shut-up and suppress any objection.

When we allow it, that is not tolerance. It is a concession, an admission that Islam truly is superior.

If Americans are going to avoid the fate of Europe they need to start understanding more about the mindset of their enemy. And make no mistake, Islam is your enemy. The nice taxi driver, or the lady in the headscarf may actually be nice people.

But Islam is still your enemy. It wants to subjugate you if you refuse to submit. There are no other options (other than being killed, converted or subjugated).

So, how many mosques should we allow to be built in our country? Well, how much oppression and subjugation do you want?

“Historically, examples of taqiyya include permission to renounce Islam itself in order to save one’s neck or ingratiate oneself with an enemy.

“Due to the state of war between dar al-Islam [those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule] and dar al-harb [those nations that have NOT submitted to Islamic rule], ruses of war, i.e., systematic lying to the infidel, must be considered part and parcel of Islamic tactics. The parroting by Muslim organizations throughout dar al-harb that “Islam is a religion of peace,” or that the origins of Muslim violence lie in the unbalanced psyches of particular individual “fanatics,” must be considered as disinformation intended to induce the infidel world to let down its guard.

Of course, individual Muslims may genuinely regard their religion as “peaceful” — but only insofar as they are ignorant of its true teachings, or in the sense of the Egyptian theorist Sayyid Qutb, who posited in his Islam and Universal Peace that true peace would prevail in the world just as soon as Islam had conquered it.

A telling point is that, while Muslims who present their religion as peaceful abound throughout dar al-harb, they are nearly non-existent in dar al-Islam. A Muslim apostate once suggested to me a litmus test for Westerners who believe that Islam is a religion of “peace” and “tolerance”: try making that point on a street corner in Ramallah, or Riyadh, or Islamabad, or anywhere in the Muslim world. He assured me you wouldn’t live five minutes.”

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/taqiyya-religious-deception.html

As Raymond Ibrahim said in his article, Why the Ground Zero Mosque is Counterproductive to the Islamist Cause, the mosque proposal is the most costly mistake orthodox Muslims have made since they flew planes into the World Trade Center. Ibrahim wrote:

Before the Islamist strikes of 9/11, mainstream America was incognizant of the threat posed by radical Islam. Islamic apologetics and anti-U.S. polemics were unquestioned orthodoxy, not only in their natural habitat — academia — but more generally.

After 9/11, however, the veil was partially lifted: a flood of books dealing with Islam, political Islam, jihad, sharia, “dhimmitude,” and any number of related topics appeared; politically incorrect books on Islam became bestsellers.”

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/7792/why-the-ground-zero-mosque-is-counterproductive