Islamic War Against the West

“The Koran commands “Slay, Make War on the Christians, Jews and Infidels, and in return I will give you eternal paradise in Heaven, crystal clear streams, 72 virgins, unlimited wine with no side effects and 80,000 servants each.” (Koran Sura Chapter 9:5, 29-30, 111, Sura 56, Hadith.” This is the fundamental tenet and command of Islam and the Koran: World Jihad.

The Koran is the Holy Book of Islam and the Koran is the Holy Book of every Muslim. There is no such thing as moderate Islam or a moderate Koran because every Koran contains these passages. Then why are people like John Dingell saying things like, “I want to make unequivocally clear that Islam is not a religion of division and intolerance, but a religion that values diversity and understanding.” Hasn’t anyone told Congressman Dingell what the Koran says?

Iran’s Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi Mabus said, “Every non Muslim should meet one of these fates: execution, exile or amputation of hands or legs. Islam prescribes certain rulings and those who believe in this religion must comply with them.”

So why are American politicians saying things like “Islam is a great religion. I want to make unequivocally clear that Islam is not a religion of division and intolerance, but a religion that values diversity and understanding.”

http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/islam-koran-verse-9-29-30-make-war-christians#ixzz1GG8vCzfn

Muzzammil Hassan, cut off his wife's head, founder of TV station aimed at countering negative stereotypes of Muslims.

“A former New York television executive has been sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for beheading his wife in 2009.

Muzzammil Hassan is the founder of Bridges TV, a station aimed at countering negative stereotypes of Muslims.

The Pakistan-born Muslim was served divorce papers one week before police found his wife’s body at the television station in Buffalo. She’d been stabbed and decapitated.

Hassan claimed his wife’s death was justified and said he was abused and afraid of her.

http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/muslim-tv-exec-found-guilty-wifes-beheading#ixzz1G9fpiIS0

The big mystery is, where do all those negative stereotypes of Muslims come from? Islam is just like all the other religions, right?

Look at all the Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists, Unitarians and Buddhists that cut off their wives’ heads. Happens all the time, right? Oh, wait, no this kind of violent crime seems to mostly be perpetrated by Muslim men. But surely that’s a coincidence. Wouldn’t want to create a stereotype.

“A suicide bombing killed at least 34 people and injured more than 40 at a funeral held by an anti-Taliban tribal militia Wednesday in northwest Pakistan, prompting militia leaders to angrily rebuke the government for failing to provide enough support for their battle against insurgents.

A teenage boy appeared at the funeral and was thought to be a mourner, witnesses and local police said. But just as prayers began, the boy moved into the crowd and detonated explosives hidden under his shawl.

Members of the militia, known as a lashkar, complained that local officials had not provided security for the funeral. Witnesses said armed militiamen ringed the mourners, but the boy was able to get through undetected.”

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan-funeral-20110310,0,1797201.story?track=rss

“POLICE are searching three properties and planning to interview more witnesses as a major anti-terrorism investigation continues following the arrest of a man in Glasgow in connection with the Stockholm suicide bombing.

The 30-year-old foreign national, said by neighbours to be a nursing student from Kuwait, was seized in a dawn raid yesterday after a month-long investigation, police said. He is being questioned at the high-security detention centre at Govan in Glasgow over allegedly aiding terrorists in Sweden.”

http://news.scotsman.com/news/39Suicide-bomber39-swoop-in-Glasgow.6730842.jp

Senior Executives at NPR meet with Muslim Brotherhood Front Group to solicit $5mm and discuss their federal funding,

Featuring:
Ron Schiller, President NPR Foundation.
Betsy Liley, Senior Director, NPR Institutional Giving.

Reporters:
Shaughn Adeleye as Amir Malik
Simon Templar as Ibrahmim Kasaam.

If you believe the New York Times, Brigitte Gabriel is promoting “fear” and “…doing the country a disservice by failing to make distinctions between Muslims who are potentially dangerous and those who are not.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/us/08gabriel.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

How are American citizens supposed to make distinctions between Muslims who are potentially dangerous and those who are not?

Question: How do you know if a Muslim in America is truly loyal to America, or as the Fort Hood killer said about himself, “a Muslim first and an American second”?

Answer: Once they take a gun, start killing people, shouting “Allahu Akbar” then you know they are dangerous. Or if you catch them with bomb-making materials. Until then, if you question any Muslim as being potentially dangerous you are “Islamophobic” or a “bigot”.

Many good-hearted, naive Americans are easily fooled. They don’t understand the Islamic principle of taqqiya, that Islam teaches it is OK for Muslims to deceive, lie to and trick infidels if it promotes the advancement of Islam or protects Muslims. An oath of allegiance to the US means little to devoted Muslims, because their ultimate loyalty is to the Koran and Islam – which is in direct contradiction to many values Americans hold dear.

Now, to be fair, to some Muslims maybe that oath of allegiance is real. But how do we know?

Tell me: how do I, Joe-American, make the distinctions between “Muslims who are potentially dangerous and those who are not”? This is a valid concern! It is one of the things that Americans should be alarmed about: how do we know which Muslims are dangerous and which Muslims are not?

Muslim women in Minnesota went house to house asking for money to support a “charity”. The FBI discovered they were funneling money to a terrorist group.

Kind-hearted Minnesotans were duped and gave their hard-earned money to a terrorist group.

Americans are generally inclined to give people the benefit of the doubt. More and more, however, we are losing any kind of trust we might have had of Islam and those who follow its teachings. But the kind of crap those Somali women pulled in Minnesota, as well as a steady stream of other stories, has steadily eroded any trust we might have been willing to have.

What, then, do we do?

Should we simply trust our government to protect us? Our military? Look how well that worked in Fort Hood, TX. The people who tried to warn of the danger were told to shut up and not make waves.

Another concern that Islamists want you to disregard: the greater the numbers, the greater the potential danger.

The reality is that the more “non-dangerous” Muslims we allow in our nation, the easier it is for the “dangerous Muslims” to hide until they decide to kill someone. Or, for Muslims to gain economic and political power through sheer numbers.

Islam in America is like the Trojan horse: just a big, harmless statue – with killers inside.

The New York Times article says:

“Ms. Gabriel, 46, who uses a pseudonym, casts her organization as a nonpartisan, nonreligious national security group.

She presents a portrait of Islam so thoroughly bent on destruction and domination that it is unrecognizable to those who study or practice the religion. [it’s not unrecognizable to the soldiers at Fort Hood who were attacked by a Muslim shouting “Allahu Akbar”] She has found a receptive audience among Americans who are legitimately worried about the spread of terrorism.

Ms. Gabriel says she is motivated not by fear or hatred of Islam, but by her love for her adopted country.

“I lost Lebanon, my country of birth, to radical Islam,” she wrote. “I do not want to lose my adopted country America.”

She insists that she is singling out only “radical Islam” or Muslim “extremists” — not the vast majority of Muslims or their faith.

“In the Muslim world, extreme is mainstream,” she wrote. She said that there is a “cancer” infecting the world, and said: “The cancer is called Islamofacism. This ideology is coming out of one source: The Koran.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/us/08gabriel.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

The New York Times implies that Ms. Gabriel is blowing things all out of proportion, that there really is no threat from the “Religion of Peace”. Meanwhile Americans see daily reports of more violence inflicted by Muslims on those who are not Muslim. Just today reports are coming out of Ethiopia about mobs of Muslims burning Christian churches.

Certainly, not every Muslim is violent, that is not the point, no one is saying that. The point is that the ideology taught by Islam, in the Koran, encourages – teaches – that it is OK, even a “righteous” act, for Muslims to attack or oppress non-Muslims. Why? Because Islam is right and everyone else is wrong, and the Koran predicts that one day the whole world will submit to Allah.

Thankfully there is enough humanity in most Muslims to prevent them from acting fully on the violence that the Koran teaches.

But Americans are right to be concerned. It’s not a phobia. It’s not bigotry. The threat is real. Think about it, for Pete’s sake: what other religion has caused cartoonists to fear for their lives?

When has anyone had to change their identity (due to death threats) simply because they criticized a Lutheran or a Buddhist?

We don’t hate people – but we don’t want them coming into our home, taking advantage of our hospitality and then start shoving us around, trying to enforce their rules in our home. Resisting a religion that promotes that kind of attitude is not hate. It’s refusing to be bullied by a toxic ideology.

Don’t let anyone shame you or intimidate you into backing down from that. Don’t buy the load of crap that says anyone who criticizes Islam or speaks out about the threat it brings with it is a bigot, racist or Islamophobe.

The New York Times, while piously representing itself as being concerned about promoting tolerance and fighting bigotry, tries to undermine the valid concerns of Ms. Gabriel by appealing to the prejudices of their Liberal, “Progressive” audience. The article points out Ms. Gabriel’s links to

1. Evangelical Christian conservatives,

2. Defenders of Israel (both Jews and Christians)

3. Tea Party Republicans

And we all know how bigoted and narrow-minded all those people are don’t we? [sarcasm]

Americans are starting to wonder, “Could it happen here?”

“I lost Lebanon, my country of birth, to radical Islam, I do not want to lose my adopted country America.”

“In the past two days, thousands of Muslims have razed five churches and the homes of two evangelists in Asendabo, Ethiopia. Christian leaders are asking for protection after the Muslim attackers continued burning churches even after the federal police were sent to the town.

The Muslims started the attacks yesterday after falsely accusing the Christians of desecrating the Qur’an. More than ten thousand Muslims shouted “Allah Akbar” (Allah is great) as they burned down five evangelical churches. The government sent the federal police force to protect the Christians after the Muslims burned down the first three churches. The Muslims overwhelmed the police force and burned down two more churches today.

Speaking with ICC, Christian leaders expressed their fear that Muslims will start killing the Christians unless the government sends more security forces to contain the Muslim attackers.

Ethiopia is a Christian majority country and was one of the first nations to accept Christianity. However, in the areas of the country where Muslims are the majority, Christians face attacks.”

Developing: Ethiopian Muslims Burn Down Five Churches, More Attacks Feared

“Ethiopia is a Christian majority country and was one of the first nations to accept Christianity. However, in the areas of the country where Muslims are the majority, Christians face attacks.”

This is not about Christianity battling Islam – the group could have been Hindu, Buddhist, or Atheist and they could still be attacked by Muslims simply for not being Islamic (or the right flavor of Islam).

These attacks illustrate one of the reasons for valid concern and alarm about the growth of Islam: in country after country the pattern has been that once Muslims grow in numbers until they are no longer a minority the attacks and oppression begin.

It is a valid concern, based on a long history of such violence in other countries, that Americans will begin to experience this for themselves if areas of the US become predominantly Muslim.

It is not Islamophobia, because phobias are irrational, and this concern is completely rational: it’s based on a long, long history of Islamic oppression and violence.

It is not hate, either. Protecting yourself from a violent ideology is not hate. Resisting a toxic religion is not hate, it’s standing up for your own values against a force that intends to dominate. Accusations of hate and bigotry are just strategies to distract people and bully them into not standing firm, but to give way to followers of Islam as they shove Sharia into our nation.

If they keep you from speaking up, objecting to Islam, because you are afraid, then they have forced you to submit to Sharia law, which does not allow any criticism of Islam.

“The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee says affiliates of al-Qaida are radicalizing some American Muslims and that he plans to hold hearings on the threat they pose to the U.S.

Republican congressman Peter King of New York told CNN’s “State of the Union” that he sees an international movement with elements in the United States of Muslims becoming more radical and identifying with terrorists.”

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110306/ap_on_re_us/us_muslim_hearings_rally;_ylt=AuI_TnWCO30QaIjp_zAqtuh0fNdF

But guess what? Muslim and “interfaith” groups are organizing a protest against these hearings. Why? The study is to identify extremist Islamic threats. Why would “peace-loving” Muslims object to that?

Or are they trying to stifle any objection to Islam, to suppress any criticism of Islam as a way of enforcing Sharia on Americans? Sharia does not allow anyone to criticize Islam or its prophet, if Muslims can succeed in shouting down any objection, they have succeeded in imposing Sharia law in one small way. The strategy is to keep pushing and pushing, gaining ground little by little over weak, corrupt Americans.

More about the “rally”:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110306/ap_on_re_us/us_muslim_hearings_rally;_ylt=AuI_TnWCO30QaIjp_zAqtuh0fNdF

Comments, responses to this article:

“This is why American Muslims will never earn any respect as a peace loving religion.

Rather than protesting this, American Muslims should be openly and actively supporting the investigation since, after all, it’s intention is to locate, isolate and expose the fringe extremist elements that are using that religion to deliver terrorism, hate and murder on its behalf.

This would be the equivalent of Catholics protesting an investigation of child molestation in the Church heirarchy. That never happened. Catholics want the pedophiles exposed and removed from their religion, since their actions tarnish the entire faith.

Muslims joining in this protest are effectively PROVING they support the extremist elements, and they share in their messages of hatred and murder.”
– MissDeviant

___________

“So now the liberals are telling us it is “wrong to single out a religious minority”, even when that minority is responsible for most of the terrorism in the world?

I don’t think so.

The Islamic religion is intolerant of other religions and advocates the use of lies and violence to spread itself; some of its followers indiscriminately kill and maim innocent men, women and children in pursuit of this goal and to impose their political will on others.

Our responsibility to protect ourselves takes precedence over any insane liberal notion that we are obligated to ignore the role of Islam in terrorism.

Muslims not directly involved in the violence are complicit in their silence; why are they not publicly condemning and helping to bring the terrorists to judgment?

When Muslims put their civic responsibilities to our society ahead of their faith-based solidarity with terrorists, they’ll have a legitimate claim to the protections our society offers.

Until then, we must do whatever it takes to protect ourselves from them”
– Sapient

“…we have friends who are of the Muslim faith, and their are many Muslims who have adapted to the American way of life and are honorable loyal people.

They came here to escape the madness of their own countries, not to come here just to see America slip slide into the miasma they escaped.”
-QBB

 
Continue reading →

The speech below was written in 1899 by Winston Churchill

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 London)

Why are we spending millions of dollars we don’t have on refurbishing foreign mosques with US tax dollars? Especially when our own domestic programs, including education are facing dramatic cuts?

“Trying to buy respect with US dollars just shows US weakness – Muslims are laughing all the way to the bank.”

Video here:

http://www.wsbtv.com/video/25764282/index.html